Jesse Ventura Interviews Pilots For 9/11 Truth

UPDATE: Dec 18th. Jesse hit a grand slam home run! Way to go Jesse....be sure to watch this show!

Jesse Ventura invited representatives of Pilots For 9/11 Truth to discuss the 9/11/2001 attack on the Pentagon.

Be sure to watch the premier on truTV, Friday, December 17, 2010. 10PM Eastern, with an Encore at 2AM Saturday Morning.

Note: If you do not have truTV, you can watch it here via Live Stream.



NOTE: 9/11 Internet Troll Leslie Davis has joined us below with a comment intended to "kill the messenger" so you will hate Jesse and won't bother to listen to his show. (Jesse ought to be good as I've noticed several trolls working overtime here).

In his attempt to continue the cover up, Davis has taken his tactics directly from the Playbook for 9/11 Trolls: the Twenty Five Rules of Disinformation (check 'em all out).

#3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such "arguable rumors". If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a "wild rumor" which can have no basis in fact.

#5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

#6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

#7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

#17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can "argue" with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

#20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

#23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

The 9/11 Troll comment by Leslie Davis below is a classic: