NEW HAMPSHIRE 9/11 TRUTH: MIT Engineer Disputes 9/11 Theory of the WTC Collapse

MIT Engineer Disputes 9/11 Theory of the WTC Collapse

MIT Engineer Jeff King's logical look at the official story of the WTC collapse.

Part 1

Part 2

No comments:

Questioning the official story of 9/11 is an act of responsible citizenship.

We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.

Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence. The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.

Is this story true?

We don't think so.

Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest. There are numerous red flags in the official story, which requires a long series of highly improbable coincidences.

Questioning the official story is an act of responsible citizenship.

NEW HAMPSHIRE 9/11 TRUTH

MIT Engineer Disputes 9/11 Theory of the WTC Collapse

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scientists find Catastrophic Collapse of WTC due to explosives - proof in the dust

Not Hit by anything, WTC BUILDING #7 Collapses on 9/11

SEARCH THIS BLOG

SUBJECT INDEX

The George W. Bush Legacy:

ARCHIVE

OTHER RESOURCES

Questioning the official story of 9/11 is an act of responsible citizenship.