September 25, 2010, Jesse Ventura discussed his book, "American Conspiracies: Lies, Lies, and More Dirty Lies that the Government Tells Us." He was speaking at Baltimore’s annual BookFest, which is held in the Mt. Vernon Square section of the city. Mr. Ventura was joined on the program by Richard Sher, an ex-news reader/presenter for WJZ-TV in Baltimore, MD.
David Chandler on WTC 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions
The video shown here is the latest in the series. It is a result of collaboration between David Chandler and Debora Blake, who contributed some of the visuals and did the video editing:
There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7).
NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away.
They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building.
Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues.
This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster.
Jaw Dropper Interview: The Hidden History of 9/11
Guns and Butter interview with Paul Zarembka*
How much insider trading occurred in the days leading up to 9/11?
How compromised is the evidence against alleged hijackers because of serious authentication problems with a key Dulles Airport videotape?
To what extent does the testimony of more than five hundred firefighters differ from official reports of what happened at the World Trade Center buildings that day?
How inseparably connected are Western covert operations to al-Qaeda?
How is Islamophobia used to sustain US imperialism?
How compromised is the evidence against alleged hijackers because of serious authentication problems with a key Dulles Airport videotape?
To what extent does the testimony of more than five hundred firefighters differ from official reports of what happened at the World Trade Center buildings that day?
How inseparably connected are Western covert operations to al-Qaeda?
How is Islamophobia used to sustain US imperialism?
* Paul Zarembka is a professor of economics at the State University of New York at Buffalo. Since 1977, he has been the general editor for Research in Political Economy. He has authored Toward a Theory of Economic Development, edited Frontiers in Econometrics, and co-edited Essays in Modern Capital Theory.
Ahmadinejad Defends 9/11 Remarks
ALJAZEERA: Iran president challenges UN to set up fact-finding mission to investigate whether attacks on the US were a conspiracy.
Western diplomats left the hall when Ahmadinejad on Thursday said many believe 9/11 was a conspiracy [Reuters]
Iran's president has defended remarks he made on 9/11 attacks during his speech at the UN General Assembly.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Friday that the background to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the US in 2001 was "suspicious".
A day earlier US and several Western diplomats walked out of the UN summit as Ahmadinejad said many believed "some segments within the US government orchestrated the attack".
Speaking to journalists in New York on Friday, he challenged the UN to set up a fact-finding mission to investigate the attacks in which almost 3,000 people died.
"I did not pass judgement, but don't you feel that the time has come to have a fact finding committee," Ahmadinejad said.
US Responds in Full Attack Mode:
The White House described the remarks as the latest in a long list of outrageous comments that would deepen Tehran's isolation from the international community.
Barack Obama, the US president, on Friday described the Iranian president's remarks as "offensive and hateful".
"And particularly for him to make the statement here in Manhattan, just a little north of Ground Zero, where families lost their loved ones, people of all faiths, all ethnicities who see this as the seminal tragedy of this generation, for him to make a statement like that was inexcusable," he said in an interview with the BBC Persian news service.
The US and its Western allies are locked in a standoff with Iran over its nuclear programme, which Washington believes aims to produce atomic weapons but which Tehran says is for solely peaceful purposes.
In a speech at the UN on Thursday, Obama reiterated the US position that the door to diplomacy with Iran remained open but that Tehran must fulfil international obligations over its nuclear programme.
Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from the UN headquarters, said Ahmadinejad's remarks had stirred anger in the US.
"This has really touched a raw nerve here. Many people you speak to are very, very angry about the comments," he said.
However, our correspondent said that after lashing out at Ahmadinejad's remarks, Obama had renewed his offer for talks with Iran.
"I think the Americans are trying to put this spat behind them and move on because they really do feel that there is the possibility of fresh talks with Iran. They know this is an important opportunity.
For his part, Ahmadinejad told a news conference on Friday that he was ready for talks with the international community. He said an Iranian official might meet next month with world powers to prove that Tehran's nuclear programme is purely peaceful.
The UN Security Council in June imposed a fourth set of sanctions against Iran over its refusal to stop enriching uranium and to prove Iran is not trying to build an atomic bomb. The European Union and the US have added even more extensive sanctions targeting its foreign trade.
Asked what other actions could be taken if sanctions do not work, Obama said on Friday: "There are a whole host of options. And these options would be exercised in consultation with the international community."
Without specifying what additional options he had in mind, Obama said a diplomatic solution remained possible. "But it is going to require a change in mindset inside the ... Iranian government."
Al Jazeera Links to 9/11 Truth Web Site
It's about time.
Iranian President Ahmadinejad's comments at the UN raised the issue of US government involvement in the attacks. An Al Jazeera article covering these remarks included a section with the title 'Alternative Perspectives." The segment included the following:
The most popular website on so-called alternative views on the September 11, 2001, attacks seems to be 911truth.org. The site acts as a clearing house for an array of various views and refuses to articulate an exact position on who it believes launched the attacks and why. Rather, it poses a series of questions, while offering readers the "Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story".
A "documentary" called Loose Change questioning the official 9/11 narrative, has been popular among activist groups and other more traditional doubters.
"That 19 hijackers are going to completely bypass security and crash four commercial airliners in a span of two hours, with no interruption from the military forces, in the most guarded airspace in the United States and the world? That to me is a conspiracy theory," Korey Rowe, the film's director, told Time magazine.
Mainstream media in the West, and even the US government itself, have felt a need to respond to these theories. The US state department's Bureau of International Information Programs has a website devoted to debunking the "top September 11 conspiracy theories".
In a piece titled "Why the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Won't Go Away", Time argues that what many would call conspiracy theories are "not a fringe phenomenon".
'Planned demolition'
Some of the more unconventional claims include that the twin towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the petrol stored in their tanks. Rather, the buildings collapsed in a planned, controlled demolition - perhaps through explosions in the basement.
Another popular theory is that a missile fired by elements from within the US government hit the Pentagon, rather than an aircraft. Some of the "alternative" or "conspiratorial" views come from people who seem like serious scholars."
Ahmadinejad - Lost in Translation
There's another other side to the story about the US Delegation making a big show of walking out during his remarks about 9/11.
Iran's president takes center stage at the United Nations but due to a "technical error" Ahmadinejad's remarks about 9/11 failed to be heard.
United Nations, New York, Sept 24, 2010
The following is an excerpt from President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's (written) speech delivered to the 65th annual meeting of United Nations General Assembly (full text here):
. . . "It was said that some three thousands people were killed on the 11 September for which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the conflict is still going on and expanding.
In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints.
1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack. This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.
2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime.
The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.
3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents.
The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found.
There remain, however, a few questions to be answered:
1- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?
2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?
3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent person was hurt.
It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the 11th September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden. *
I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars, thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference. . ."
Read the FULL transcript here.
ED NOTE: We have read on the internet that there is some dispute about the accuracy of the translation of Ahmadinegad's remarks into English. We will post more when this is sorted out.
* We think that this one line is the most important part of this speech and the one thing that won't be covered seriously by any mainstream news media. Instead, it is Ahmadinejad's Holocaust-denying-anti-Semitic nonsense that they wish us to focus on so that we will ignore the truth when he does speak it out loud.
Dang. When the "wrong person" speaks the Truth - we ignore it at our peril.
This is how (the liberal) Rachel Maddow handled it on her news show. She seldom misses an opportunity to bash the 9/11 Truth Movement and we think she ought to have known better and think less of her for remarks like these:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
NH News: Protesters outside Carol Shea-Porter's Congressional Office insist Trade Center attack probe flawed
By Jennifer Keefe
jkeefe@fosters.com
Friday, September 10, 2010
DOVER, NH — Speaking up over the noise of passing cars and trucks on Washington Street Thursday, clinical psychologist Herbert Hoffman read through a list of evidence that the investigation of the World Trade Center attacks was deeply flawed.
"The scientific forensic facts we have discovered have troubling implications," Hoffman said, holding a list of the findings of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, of which he is a member.
Several other members gathered with Hoffman outside Carol Shea-Porter's congressional office holding signs reading "9/11 Questions Still Unanswered," "Why wasn't Ground Zero treated like any other crime scene?" and "Honor the Dead: Demand the Truth."
The AE911Truth organization spans the country and was founded by Richard Gage. Press conferences like the one on Washington Street were held at 65 locations around the world Thursday, including Washington, D.C.
Gage prepared the statement for each news conference to read.
Hoffman said the group doesn't claim to know who is behind what they are calling an "assisted" explosion of the Twin Towers, but evidence from the aftermath points to such a theory.
"Both Twin Towers were completely dismembered and destroyed in 10 to 14 seconds," Hoffman read. "For this to happen, all 47 of their massive core columns, as well as a large fraction of their external columns, would have to be severed with explosives beforehand."
Among other points were accounts from first responders that they saw flashes of light and heard explosions at the onset of the destruction and that the 90,000 tons of concrete and metal decking demolished in mid-air was indicative of an explosion.
He also pointed out that building number seven, which was not hit by an aircraft, came down "in pure free-fall acceleration" for more than 100 feet; the implication of which, Hoffman said, is "the columns must have been severed within fractions of a second of each other."
The group said they have faced resistance in their quest to get congressional leaders and representatives to push for a re-investigation of the incident, including a "noncommittal" response from Shea-Porter.
They brought a petition into her office Thursday.
"We're asking for them to take leadership in reopening the investigation," said Hoffman, an Ogunquit, Maine resident who has taken the group's message to his own state senators.
When asked how people could comprehend the well-organized plot to demolish the Twin Towers that the group suggests, member Rob Stewart referenced the Manhattan Project to develop the first atomic bombs.
"That was kept secret," he said, adding he had been skeptical of such groups and demonstrations until he researched it further. "I would encourage everyone to take a look. It's really astonishing, and there's no other time that this could be more important than now, in a time of war."
The Monadnock 9/11 Truth Alliance banded together with Peace Activists to honor the 9th Anniversary of September 11, 2001
Soundtrack: Johnny Cash - "The Man Comes Around "
Dennis Kucinich: 911 Truth and Reconciliation
On the 9th Anniversary of 9/11, Rep. Dennis Kucinich made this video message to us all:
In a statement he made on 9/11/2001 - on the day of the attacks, he proved himself to be a visionary. Unfortunately his wise words were not heeded:
Washington, 9/11/2001 "America grieves this day for the victims of these terrorist attacks, and for their families and friends. Our prayers are with them and our hearts go out to those who have endured unbearable loss today.
Our most hopeful thoughts are with those who have risked their lives in heroic rescue efforts. In this grim moment, we must be resolute in protecting the fabric of our democracy and the individual freedoms that make America a great nation.
As we grieve, we cannot let terrorists win by turning the United States into a national security state. We cannot let their dialogue become our dialogue.
America must remain calm because such calm is essential to preserving our liberties. America must bring to justice those responsible for these cowardly deeds. We must be cautious about rolling back freedoms at home or placing blame in the wrong place.
America must continue to be a beacon of democracy for the world. Let this sad moment cause all governments and all people of good will around the world to unite and to move together to challenge and uproot those who have destructive goals which seek to create death and drive the world toward chaos.
Now, more than ever, America must continue to be a force for peace in the world. We must not let the terrorists win."
ED NOTE: And sadly, George Bush ignored Kucinich and led us into two bogus wars that has killed legions of innocents, weakened our Constitution, trashed our freedoms, plundered our National Treasures, broken our hearts and left our Nation broken and divided.
And to fix it all, we must begin by telling the Truth of 9/11.
In a statement he made on 9/11/2001 - on the day of the attacks, he proved himself to be a visionary. Unfortunately his wise words were not heeded:
Washington, 9/11/2001 "America grieves this day for the victims of these terrorist attacks, and for their families and friends. Our prayers are with them and our hearts go out to those who have endured unbearable loss today.
Our most hopeful thoughts are with those who have risked their lives in heroic rescue efforts. In this grim moment, we must be resolute in protecting the fabric of our democracy and the individual freedoms that make America a great nation.
As we grieve, we cannot let terrorists win by turning the United States into a national security state. We cannot let their dialogue become our dialogue.
America must remain calm because such calm is essential to preserving our liberties. America must bring to justice those responsible for these cowardly deeds. We must be cautious about rolling back freedoms at home or placing blame in the wrong place.
America must continue to be a beacon of democracy for the world. Let this sad moment cause all governments and all people of good will around the world to unite and to move together to challenge and uproot those who have destructive goals which seek to create death and drive the world toward chaos.
Now, more than ever, America must continue to be a force for peace in the world. We must not let the terrorists win."
ED NOTE: And sadly, George Bush ignored Kucinich and led us into two bogus wars that has killed legions of innocents, weakened our Constitution, trashed our freedoms, plundered our National Treasures, broken our hearts and left our Nation broken and divided.
And to fix it all, we must begin by telling the Truth of 9/11.
Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Original article excerpted from Redacted News posted August 31, 2010 - check out the original, it is worth reading (with footnotes).
The latest book by Dr. David Ray Griffin
* ACTION ALERT: If you go to Amazon to read about this book, please be sure to click and request the Kindle version - as there are NO credible books about 9/11 available for the Kindle.
There are also NO credible books about 9/11 recorded and available from Audible.com Please call or email them to request this.
* ACTION ALERT: If you go to Amazon to read about this book, please be sure to click and request the Kindle version - as there are NO credible books about 9/11 available for the Kindle.
There are also NO credible books about 9/11 recorded and available from Audible.com Please call or email them to request this.
The paper “Conspiracy Theories” by Harvard law professors Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule is a warning for all 9/11 Truth groups. Although the paper is allegedly about conspiracy theory in a general sense, it is clearly centered on 9/11. I submit that this indicates a rising concern within certain powerful but ill-defined circles. Below is a self-explanatory segment from Sunstein’s Wikipedia page as well as Dr. David Ray Griffin’s new book, Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled Conspiracy Theories, in which they wrote, ”The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be.”
They go on to propose that, ”the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”, where they suggest, among other tactics, ”Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of secret government payments to outside commentators, who are then held out as independent experts; they suggest that ”government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes,” further warning that ”too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed.”
Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, ”might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts.”
This position has been criticized by some commentators who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens.
Shortly after taking office on January 20, 2009 President Obama appointed Harvard law professor (and personal friend) Cass Sunstein to the post of administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. In June 2009 Sunstein published an essay in The Journal of Political Philosophy entitled “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures,” in which he provided an “analysis” of conspiracy theories, viewing them, as his title indicated, as “caused” by psychological conditions and requiring “cures”, i.e., elimination.
The article led to an outcry by civil libertarians of all political stripes, who especially singled out for protest Sunstein’s call for covert “cognitive infiltration” by government agents of organizations the government deems “conspiracist”.
Because Sunstein explicitly states that “9/11 conspiracy theories” are his main focus, virtually all interpreters have agreed that Sunstein’s call for what is essentially another Cointelpro Operation is directed specifically against the 9/11 truth movement.
(Cointelpro, or “Counter Intelligence Program”, was the FBI’s name for its high-priority operations to infiltrate, provoke, undermine and disable civil rights, socialist, antiwar, black power and Native American movements during the late 1950s and the 1960s.)
The fantastic picture Sunstein paints of the 9/11 truth movement as “harmful,” “dangerous,” and likely to resort to “terrorism” suggests that he is serving a function similar to Philip Zelikow’s during the Bush/Cheney years; in his own way, Sunstein too is a “myth-maker.”
In his new book COGNITIVE INFILTRATION David Ray Griffin has provided the first truly adequate response to Sunstein’s deeply-flawed and legally-questionable arguments. Griffin penetrates the obfuscation and phony scholarship employed by Sunstein to create the illusion of a rational critique of the 9/11 truth movement’s alternative account of the events of September 11, 2001.
Griffin presents a series of ten theses put forward by Sunstein, and shows that each is fundamentally flawed. Further, he demonstrates that Sunstein is unable to avoid numerous self-contradictions, either explicit or implied, that together amount to an internal, hidden counter-argument to his own position, which Griffin, in a novel and entertaining approach, brings out as an ironic “esoteric” meaning of Sunstein’s essay.
Griffin demonstrates that Sunstein is completely unable to refute the major positions of the 9/11 truth movement, and doesn’t actually even try to do so. Instead, Sunstein has produced a pseudo-scholarly fake “analysis” as a basis for a call for the government to infiltrate and neutralize the movement through activities which create “cognitive dissonance,” clearly not the least bit different from the FBI’s Cointelpro operations.
But in so doing Sunstein has provided Griffin the means to demonstrate yet again that defenders of the official account of 9/11 actually cannot proceed by using reason and fact. They are forced to resort to disinformation, suppression of evidence, lies, illogic, threats and intimidation, always with the same result: failure. The more people study the events of 9/11 the more certain they become that the government and its media outlets are lying.
Sunstein’s essay appears to reveal that the government response to its ongoing failure will be to resort to illegal activities directed against people who are speaking out about the highest crimes carried out in the corridors of power.
The remarkably inept manner in which he makes his case suggests, however, that providing a rationale for such a future policy may not have been his real intention. Rather, it seems plausible that his purpose is to suggest that such actions have not even been considered before, let alone implemented, when in fact such operations have been ongoing since 9/11.
Griffin’s COGNITIVE INFILTRATION is a lucid and compelling exposure of the contempt held by the official defenders the 9/11 myth for dissenters who have seen through their Big Lie.
These officials expect that no one will be able to penetrate the murk of Sunstein’s latest defense of the pretext for the US wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq, now covertly expanding into many other countries.
But with David Ray Griffin’s book, everyone who is concerned with bringing their carnage and criminality to a stop, as well as to reverse the rapid erosion of civil liberties in this country, will have no difficulty remaining clear-headed in the face of the “cognitive infiltration” carried out by the holders of high office and their agents.
Buy it now - click here.
Eyewitness David Long - Explosive Interview
On May 8, 2009, members of Truth Action Ottawa interviewed Mr. David Long, who was in downtown Manhattan the morning of September 11, 2001.
Mr. Long recounts everything he saw and heard that morning, including multiple streams of molten metal pouring from the buildings before they fell, and the sounds of multiple explosions as the buildings came down.
Expand Your Awareness of 9/11 - Forum in Keene, NH
Community Forum Honoring 9/11
Saturday September 11, at 3 pm.
Alumni Recital Hall, Redfern Arts Center, Keene State College.
(Free Admission)
Panel participants include former Keene Mayor Blastos, NH Representative Barbara Richardson, and Other Professionals from the Community.
Revealing video clips, suppressed by the media, will be shown.
Q & A session
* Organized by Monadnock 9/11 Truth Alliance, co-sponsored by the Economics/Political Science Department at Keene State College.
Alumni Recital Hall, Redfern Arts Center, Keene State College.
(Free Admission)
Panel participants include former Keene Mayor Blastos, NH Representative Barbara Richardson, and Other Professionals from the Community.
Revealing video clips, suppressed by the media, will be shown.
Q & A session
* Organized by Monadnock 9/11 Truth Alliance, co-sponsored by the Economics/Political Science Department at Keene State College.
Dwain Deets Endorses CIT's National Security Alert, and the Flyover Conclusion
So, who is Dwain Deets?
Glad you asked.
Dwain is currently retired after 37 years with NASA, where he worked as an aeronautical engineer and flight director for Aerospace Projects. In other words:
"Dwain Deets is that Rocket Scientist who understands complicated & technical things."
Glad you asked.
Dwain is currently retired after 37 years with NASA, where he worked as an aeronautical engineer and flight director for Aerospace Projects. In other words:
"Dwain Deets is that Rocket Scientist who understands complicated & technical things."
QUOTE:
"Although my involvement in the 9/11 issue has focused primarily on the problems with the "collapse" hypothesis for World Trade Center Building 7, my background as a retired NASA aeronautical engineer has often brought questions my way regarding the airplanes, including, of course, the flight that allegedly struck the Pentagon.
Examination of the official flight profile raised serious technical questions in my mind -- questions which led me to the view that it is highly unlikely such a profile could have been flown as reported. In other words, it seemed to be physically and aeronautically impossible.
My skepticism proved to be well-founded when I watched National Security Alert, the most recent video from the Citizen Investigation Team, or CIT. More importantly, I now realize that the flight profile data released by the government was a spurious smokescreen, and that the answer to the question of what really happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 comes from applying logic, with very little involvement of aeronautical principals.
To be more precise, the answer comes from eyewitness accounts collected from individuals who had clear views of where the plane flew in relation to the Citgo gas station across the highway from the Pentagon. Several of these witnesses were recorded by the Center for Military History or by the Library of Congress shortly after 9/11/01. CIT followed up on this testimony, doing investigative video interviews at the various sites where each person made their observations, or, when this couldn’t be done, by audio recording.
In a nutshell, these key eyewitnesses independently agree that the plane flew north of the Citgo gas station as it headed toward the Pentagon. It is clear from viewing their interviews that it is simply not a reasonable consideration that all of the witnesses presented are incorrect about this simple detail. The plane was most definitely on the north side of the station.
The problem with this is that the official flight path requires the plane to have flown to the south of the station. The observed damage is wholly inconsistent with an approach from the north-side. This not only includes the damage inside the building leading to the round hole in the C-ring, but also five light poles which were supposedly hit by the airplane which were also in alignment with a south-side path. Given that the plane was on the north-side of the station, these light poles simply could not have been knocked over by it.
The only possible conclusion, if logic is your guide, is that the plane did not hit the Pentagon and did not cause the damage; that the south-path downed light poles were staged; and that the internal damage was done by other means, specifically internal explosives.
I am aware of efforts by a few to censor and marginalize the work of Citizen Investigation Team. Some have stated it’s because they feel the notion of a flyover at the Pentagon would be bad for the truth movement even if true because it would be off-putting to the public at large. This is contradictory logic since the very notion that 9/11 was an inside job is off-putting to the public. I strongly feel it’s important to follow evidence wherever it leads us and stand firmly against any effort to hide or control information that exposes the 9/11 deception.
I thank CIT for bringing this story together in a clear manner, and I endorse CIT as the best source of information on this matter. Furthermore, I agree with their conclusion -- the plane flew over the Pentagon."
-Dwain Deets
Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden
Creator of www.7problemswithbuilding7.info
Real Time Problems with Bill Maher? Yes.
Part 1
Part 2
For some years, HBOs satirical weekly talk show host Bill Maher - of Real Time, has repeatedly vocalized his anger at those who question the government's account of the events of September 11th.
Whether its directed against a guest or used as a punch line, activists who try to tell the Truth of 9/11 have been lambasted as tin foil hat conspiracy theorists.
But, then again, Bill Maher also publicly states the Twin Towers burned for more than two hours. This would make little impact on national opinion if it were not for Maher's impressive viewership numbers. Ratings are the mark of a TV man and Bill is holding the high cards.
However, when it comes to documentation of what actually occurred on that tragic day and the alleged evidence that has since surfaced, it seems, the time has come for Maher to rethink his hand and call or fold.
Countless viewers and fans have contacted Real Time - and its producers over the years out of frustration and hope of getting any one - of a growing number, of experts invited onto his show as a guest to openly - without bias, discuss new evidence that appears to contradict most of what we have been told.
Maher and his team have not only refused to respond to any of their correspondence, but have also continued the live derision of a people, on a topic he has refused to research in any reputable way. So much so, that even after a $250,000 cash challenge issued by Jock Doubleday (to merely study the evidence), Maher continues his refusal to acknowledge on his show, all scientific evidence, the inconsistencies of the 9/11 Commission Report and the foreknowledge, cover-up, and/or the possible secret involvement of the United States Government in these attacks.
After more than a year of honest attempts, the 9/11 Truth Movement is done being belittled and used as television fodder for a comedian who seems to have taken on the 9/11 challenge and their message as a pet project to destroy.
UnSpun Newz's Adam Ruff and Cheri Roberts have picked up the challenge. This is their story.
Are there higher powers pushing the proverbial censorship buttons on Real Time? In viewing this newscast you will better understand the upcoming UnSpun Newz SPECIAL investigative report that will dig deeper into who signs Mr. Maher's paycheck and what exactly their ties are to 9/11 then - and 9/11 now.
Part 2
For some years, HBOs satirical weekly talk show host Bill Maher - of Real Time, has repeatedly vocalized his anger at those who question the government's account of the events of September 11th.
Whether its directed against a guest or used as a punch line, activists who try to tell the Truth of 9/11 have been lambasted as tin foil hat conspiracy theorists.
But, then again, Bill Maher also publicly states the Twin Towers burned for more than two hours. This would make little impact on national opinion if it were not for Maher's impressive viewership numbers. Ratings are the mark of a TV man and Bill is holding the high cards.
However, when it comes to documentation of what actually occurred on that tragic day and the alleged evidence that has since surfaced, it seems, the time has come for Maher to rethink his hand and call or fold.
Countless viewers and fans have contacted Real Time - and its producers over the years out of frustration and hope of getting any one - of a growing number, of experts invited onto his show as a guest to openly - without bias, discuss new evidence that appears to contradict most of what we have been told.
Maher and his team have not only refused to respond to any of their correspondence, but have also continued the live derision of a people, on a topic he has refused to research in any reputable way. So much so, that even after a $250,000 cash challenge issued by Jock Doubleday (to merely study the evidence), Maher continues his refusal to acknowledge on his show, all scientific evidence, the inconsistencies of the 9/11 Commission Report and the foreknowledge, cover-up, and/or the possible secret involvement of the United States Government in these attacks.
After more than a year of honest attempts, the 9/11 Truth Movement is done being belittled and used as television fodder for a comedian who seems to have taken on the 9/11 challenge and their message as a pet project to destroy.
UnSpun Newz's Adam Ruff and Cheri Roberts have picked up the challenge. This is their story.
Are there higher powers pushing the proverbial censorship buttons on Real Time? In viewing this newscast you will better understand the upcoming UnSpun Newz SPECIAL investigative report that will dig deeper into who signs Mr. Maher's paycheck and what exactly their ties are to 9/11 then - and 9/11 now.
Music: "9/11's a Lie" by the "Free Bees" - Based on the song "Stayin' Alive" by the Bee Gees
Much respect goes to the music of the Bee Gees and Pink Floyds "Another Brick in the Wall" both of which were used for the inspiration of this work.
LYRICS:
Well you can tell
By the way the buildings fell
There was something wrong
Now it's time to tell
Spread the word it's nothing new
You've gotta educate yourself in truth
Well it's not alright, it's not okay
For you to look the other way
We can help you understand
The New York Times effect on man
Whether you're a brother
Or whether you're a mother
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Neo-cons are shaking
The world has started waking
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
Well we can't give in we can't let go
If we wanna see some justice flow
It's time for us to make a stand
And together we can end this plan
It's not alright, it's not okay
For you to look the other way
The wars they fight, just ain't right
I don't know how they sleep at night
Whether you're a brother
Or whether you're a mother
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Neo-cons are shaking
The world has started waking
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
We're getting stronger
Won't take much longer
The truth will set us free
Let's break our silence
No need for violence
Become the change we want to see
9/11 was an inside job
9/11 was an inside job
We need a peaceful revolution
We need to know we have a choice
We've let them get away with murder
It's time for us to find our voice
Whether you're a brother
Or whether you're a mother
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Neo-cons are shaking
The world has started waking
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
Well you can tell
By the way the buildings fell
There was something wrong
Now it's time to tell
Spread the word it's nothing new
You've gotta educate yourself in truth
Well it's not alright, it's not okay
For you to look the other way
We can help you understand
The New York Times effect on man
Whether you're a brother
Or whether you're a mother
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Neo-cons are shaking
The world has started waking
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
Well we can't give in we can't let go
If we wanna see some justice flow
It's time for us to make a stand
And together we can end this plan
It's not alright, it's not okay
For you to look the other way
The wars they fight, just ain't right
I don't know how they sleep at night
Whether you're a brother
Or whether you're a mother
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Neo-cons are shaking
The world has started waking
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
We're getting stronger
Won't take much longer
The truth will set us free
Let's break our silence
No need for violence
Become the change we want to see
9/11 was an inside job
9/11 was an inside job
We need a peaceful revolution
We need to know we have a choice
We've let them get away with murder
It's time for us to find our voice
Whether you're a brother
Or whether you're a mother
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Neo-cons are shaking
The world has started waking
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11's a lie
Ah ah ah ah
9/11's a lie
9/11 Music: "Trouble in the Rubble" by Vic Sadot
This song reveals the fact that many of the rescue dogs of 9/11 had their feet burned by "white-hot debris". Curiously, the reporter did not question or explain how this came to be.
While this story is consistent with other reports of pools of molten steel still being "white-hot" many weeks after the free-fall collapse and disintegration of the World Trade Center towers, it is not consistent with the official conspiracy story that the towers fell into rubble as a result of jet fuel fires after Muslims flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.
Vic Sadot is a singer-songwriter based in Berkeley, C
Radio Debate: Richard Gage vs Dave Thomas
Part 1/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzdSbjTEFcsOn Saturday August 21st, 2010, Richard Gage, AIA from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Dave Thomas a Physicist from New Mexicans for Science and Reason, joined Ian Punnett on Coast to Coast AM for the entire program of 4 hours to debate how the World Trade Center buildings collapsed on September 11, 2001.
Physicist Kim Johnson and Chemist Niels Harrit joined the discussion in hour three.
Note: this debate has been broken down into 11 YouTube videos. The video player posted here should play all videos in sequence, from video 1 to 11. See below for direct links to each video if you need them.
Part 1/11 (below): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzdSbjTEFcs
Part 2/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6h5sQqN_x8
Part 3/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nbSXp-Hr6U
Part 4/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UePiVEiNy4k
Part 5/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOXpKnC-Kxs
Part 6/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V93lg0P35QE
Part 7/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFKHxvePQsI
Part 8/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSbb_nZuQdk
Part 9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYaNqM9EQ2E
Part 10/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv2E0BNoGIs
Part 11/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06Tj7o2eAD8
The 9/11 Debate (quoted from Coast to Coast website):
Gage believes the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition involving thermite. "I think the dust of the World Trade Center reveals the secret of the cause that we're all looking for," he said. The dust contained billions of tiny spheres (about the diameter of a human hair) of previously molten iron, Gage revealed. This means the iron in the spheres sustained temperatures exceeding 2800 degrees, twice as high as what a jet fuel fire can produce, but within the range of a thermite reaction, he noted. In addition, Gage said the dust contained hundreds of small red-gray chips, which he identified as highly-advanced nano-thermite composite explosive material.
Thomas expressed his support for the gravitational collapse model. As the planes slammed into the twin towers, they cut through steel support structures and ignited immense fires across the floors of the building, he said. Heat from the fires further weakened the floor trusses, causing them to sag and pull in the perimeter walls, he continued. The additional weight, along with reduced support, sent the first section crashing down onto the floor beneath it with a force 30 times that of its static weight, Thomas explained. "The collapse was considered inevitable because every floor had even more dynamic force going at it," he added.
Responding to Gage's dust claims, Thomas pointed out that scientific analysis uncovered nothing unusual about the iron microspheres, and any ingredients taken to be thermite could just as easily be from the building's ordinary components (iron beams, paint, aluminum siding, etc). The two men argued about whether or not pools of molten steel had been found at the WTC site, if explosions and flashes of light were heard and seen that day, and what happened to all of the pancaked floors. They also shared their theories about what brought down Building 7 (the one not hit by a plane). Gage said it was a implosion produced by thermite; Thomas blamed damage caused by the north tower collapse, huge fires within, and a design flaw.
Physicist Kim Johnson and chemist Niels Harrit joined the discussion in hour three. Johnson observed that the WTC skyscrapers began falling precisely where they had been struck by the planes and the fires broke out, evidence he believes favors the gravitational collapse model. "A steel-framed high riser does not collapse due to fire," Harrit responded, citing an experiment by British Steel that showed an 8-story steel structure could repeatedly withstand attempts to burn it down. Harrit, like Gage, thinks the three buildings were brought down by controlled thermite explosions. Johnson called attention to the fact that none of the hundreds of dogs used to locate survivors, many of them cross-trained to find explosives, detected any trace of thermite at the 9/11 disaster site.
Physicist Kim Johnson and Chemist Niels Harrit joined the discussion in hour three.
Note: this debate has been broken down into 11 YouTube videos. The video player posted here should play all videos in sequence, from video 1 to 11. See below for direct links to each video if you need them.
Part 1/11 (below): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzdSbjTEFcs
Part 2/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6h5sQqN_x8
Part 3/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nbSXp-Hr6U
Part 4/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UePiVEiNy4k
Part 5/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOXpKnC-Kxs
Part 6/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V93lg0P35QE
Part 7/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFKHxvePQsI
Part 8/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSbb_nZuQdk
Part 9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYaNqM9EQ2E
Part 10/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv2E0BNoGIs
Part 11/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06Tj7o2eAD8
The 9/11 Debate (quoted from Coast to Coast website):
Gage believes the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition involving thermite. "I think the dust of the World Trade Center reveals the secret of the cause that we're all looking for," he said. The dust contained billions of tiny spheres (about the diameter of a human hair) of previously molten iron, Gage revealed. This means the iron in the spheres sustained temperatures exceeding 2800 degrees, twice as high as what a jet fuel fire can produce, but within the range of a thermite reaction, he noted. In addition, Gage said the dust contained hundreds of small red-gray chips, which he identified as highly-advanced nano-thermite composite explosive material.
Thomas expressed his support for the gravitational collapse model. As the planes slammed into the twin towers, they cut through steel support structures and ignited immense fires across the floors of the building, he said. Heat from the fires further weakened the floor trusses, causing them to sag and pull in the perimeter walls, he continued. The additional weight, along with reduced support, sent the first section crashing down onto the floor beneath it with a force 30 times that of its static weight, Thomas explained. "The collapse was considered inevitable because every floor had even more dynamic force going at it," he added.
Responding to Gage's dust claims, Thomas pointed out that scientific analysis uncovered nothing unusual about the iron microspheres, and any ingredients taken to be thermite could just as easily be from the building's ordinary components (iron beams, paint, aluminum siding, etc). The two men argued about whether or not pools of molten steel had been found at the WTC site, if explosions and flashes of light were heard and seen that day, and what happened to all of the pancaked floors. They also shared their theories about what brought down Building 7 (the one not hit by a plane). Gage said it was a implosion produced by thermite; Thomas blamed damage caused by the north tower collapse, huge fires within, and a design flaw.
Physicist Kim Johnson and chemist Niels Harrit joined the discussion in hour three. Johnson observed that the WTC skyscrapers began falling precisely where they had been struck by the planes and the fires broke out, evidence he believes favors the gravitational collapse model. "A steel-framed high riser does not collapse due to fire," Harrit responded, citing an experiment by British Steel that showed an 8-story steel structure could repeatedly withstand attempts to burn it down. Harrit, like Gage, thinks the three buildings were brought down by controlled thermite explosions. Johnson called attention to the fact that none of the hundreds of dogs used to locate survivors, many of them cross-trained to find explosives, detected any trace of thermite at the 9/11 disaster site.
9/11 Interrogation Tapes Found Under Desk. Tapes 'extremely relevant' as CIA said "recordings didn't exist."
Confessed "9/11 architect" Ramzi Binalshibh is being held pending trial at the U.S. military facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The CIA has tapes of [alleged] 9/11 plotter Ramzi Binalshibh being interrogated in a secret overseas prison. Discovered under a desk, the recordings could provide an unparalleled look at how foreign governments aided the U.S. in holding and questioning suspected terrorists.
CIA officials believed they had wiped away all of the agency's interrogation footage. But in 2007, a staff member discovered a box tucked under a desk in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and pulled out the Binalshibh tapes.
A Justice Department prosecutor ... is now ... probing why the Binalshibh tapes were never disclosed. Twice, the government told a federal judge they did not exist.
The tapes could complicate U.S. efforts to prosecute Binalshibh, 38. If the tapes surfaced at trial, they could clearly reveal Morocco's role in the counterterrorism program known as Greystone, which authorized the CIA to hold terrorists in secret prisons and shuttle them to other countries.
More significantly to his defense, the tapes also could provide evidence of Binalshibh's mental state within the first months of his capture. In court documents, defense lawyers have been asking for medical records to see whether Binalshibh's years in CIA custody made him mentally unstable. He is being treated for schizophrenia with a potent cocktail of anti-psychotic medications.
August 17, 2010, MSNBC Original article here.
Above text from: wanttoknow.info
CIA officials believed they had wiped away all of the agency's interrogation footage. But in 2007, a staff member discovered a box tucked under a desk in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and pulled out the Binalshibh tapes.
A Justice Department prosecutor ... is now ... probing why the Binalshibh tapes were never disclosed. Twice, the government told a federal judge they did not exist.
The tapes could complicate U.S. efforts to prosecute Binalshibh, 38. If the tapes surfaced at trial, they could clearly reveal Morocco's role in the counterterrorism program known as Greystone, which authorized the CIA to hold terrorists in secret prisons and shuttle them to other countries.
More significantly to his defense, the tapes also could provide evidence of Binalshibh's mental state within the first months of his capture. In court documents, defense lawyers have been asking for medical records to see whether Binalshibh's years in CIA custody made him mentally unstable. He is being treated for schizophrenia with a potent cocktail of anti-psychotic medications.
August 17, 2010, MSNBC Original article here.
Above text from: wanttoknow.info
Mainstream at Last? Movie: "9/11 Press For Truth" to be Shown on LINK TV
LINK TV North America Airdates (EST)
Tuesday, August 24th 01:00 am
Wednesday, August 25th 11:30 pm
Friday, August 27th 07:00 am
Saturday, August 28th 12:00 pm
DIRECTV Channel 375 | DISH Network Channel 9410
Following the attacks of September 11th, a small group of grieving families waged a tenacious battle against those who sought to bury the truth about the event -- including, to their amazement, President Bush.
As part of this special presentation LINK TV is also airing an interview with Paul Thompson, author of "The Terror Timeline," to discuss the media's role in covering 9/11.
This is a fundraiser for LINK TV. Please leave a thank you comment for showing a documentary about 9/11 Truth - or better yet, send them a donation.
LEARN MORE:
Visit the documentary’s official website to learn more or to purchase the DVD.
Tuesday, August 24th 01:00 am
Wednesday, August 25th 11:30 pm
Friday, August 27th 07:00 am
Saturday, August 28th 12:00 pm
DIRECTV Channel 375 | DISH Network Channel 9410
Following the attacks of September 11th, a small group of grieving families waged a tenacious battle against those who sought to bury the truth about the event -- including, to their amazement, President Bush.
As part of this special presentation LINK TV is also airing an interview with Paul Thompson, author of "The Terror Timeline," to discuss the media's role in covering 9/11.
This is a fundraiser for LINK TV. Please leave a thank you comment for showing a documentary about 9/11 Truth - or better yet, send them a donation.
LEARN MORE:
Visit the documentary’s official website to learn more or to purchase the DVD.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Introduce Newspaper Packed with Evidence
The “911 Investigator” goes where no mainstream newspaper has dared by detailing the witness testimony and scientific forensic evidence behind the destruction of the Three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11.
This 4-page newspaper is in full color, graphically oriented and contains over a dozen articles about our most important evidence.
This handy publication presents the compelling case for explosive controlled demolition in an easy-to-read format, while maintaining the scientific integrity that is honored by technical professionals around the globe.
It is a compact, fact-filled source for people on the run. The essential info is all in one place, making it easy to learn more and to educate others.
Published by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. And it is now available in their online store. Ships September 1, 2010
Order 100 copies for $20, shipped at low bulk prices and distribute them in your local community.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
