Showing posts with label Nanothermite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nanothermite. Show all posts
911 EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY - Chemical Engineer Mark Basile
AE911Truth's EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW!
Chemical Engineer Mark Basile - The first scientist who found thermite in the World Trade Center dust discusses in depth his process of discovery using the scientific method.
NOTE: This interview is some raw footage of one of the world class experts appearing in architects and engineer's upcoming hard hitting documentary "9/11:Explosive Evidence - Experts speak out."
Physicist Steven Jones shows thermate/thermite in WTC dust from PNACitizen Conference
We all know the official story of September 11th: four jetliners were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters, who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.
Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers, weakened by the impacts and fires, collapsed into piles of rubble. The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days, and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence.
The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.
Is this story true? No. And questioning that story is an act of responsible citizenship.
This is POWERFUL evidence that hi-tech explosives were used to bring down the towers during 9/11:
Professor Steven Jones gave a lecture at University of Texas in Austin as part of the Project for the New American Citizen's conference called 'Rebuilding America's Senses (Exposing false-flag terrorism to prevent a new 9/11).
In this talk is a never-before released X-EDS (X-Ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy) analysis of WTC dust taken from the scene showing conclusively the presence of thermate (a hotter reaction than thermite) in iron sphericals. He shows the presence of Sulfur, Aluminium, and Iron in the exact concentrations used in Thermate reactions.
This, according to Steven Jones, explains how molten steel was found in the debris since office debris and even JET-A fuel is not capable of melting steel.
He is able to scientifically rule out other possibilities (including the torches used at ground zero during cleanup) and even shows the orange glow of the dripping steel that was videotaped pouring out of the WTC towers just 5 minutes before their collapse.
Nanothermite: Interview with Niels Harrit on Danish TV (with English subtitles)
Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center.
You can download and read this scientific paper here.
Why Didn’t Millions of Gallons of Water Put Out the Ground Zero Fires?
Nanothermite usage is hazardous due to the extremely high temperatures produced and the extreme difficulty in smothering a reaction once initiated.
These toasted cars are in the lot northwest of the WTC complex. There is little visible rust so the photo was probably within a day or two of 9/11/2001.
Why Didn’t Millions of Gallons of Water Put Out the Ground Zero Fires?
4 million gallons of water were dropped on Ground Zero within the first 10 days after September 11, according to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories
Approximately three million gallons of water were hosed on site in the fire-fighting efforts, and 1 million gallons fell as rainwater, between 9/11 and 9/21 .
The spraying continued for months afterward (the 10 day period was simply the timeframe in which the DOE was sampling). Enormous amounts of water were hosed on Ground Zero continuously, day and night:
“Firetrucks [sprayed] a nearly constant jet of water on [ground zero]. You couldn’t even begin to imagine how much water was pumped in there,” said Tom Manley of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, the largest fire department union. “It was like you were creating a giant lake.”
Moreover, the fires were sprayed with thousands of gallons of high tech fire-retardants.
And yet, the world trade center fire was “the longest-burning structural fire in history”. The temperatures were so high that there was molten metal at ground zero for months after 9/11.
Why didn’t the enormous quantities of water and fire-retardant sprayed at Ground Zero put out the fires? How could fires and molten metal have burned for months, when fires from normal office and building materials and available sources of oxygen should have been doused by all of the water?
Dr. Steven Jones gives one possibility: “Thermite contains its own supply of oxygen and so the reaction cannot be smothered, even with water”.
The thermite reaction releases dangerous ultra-violet (UV) light requiring that the reaction not be viewed directly, or that special eye protection (for example, a welder’s mask) be worn.
Original source for this article here.
These toasted cars are in the lot northwest of the WTC complex. There is little visible rust so the photo was probably within a day or two of 9/11/2001.
Why Didn’t Millions of Gallons of Water Put Out the Ground Zero Fires?
4 million gallons of water were dropped on Ground Zero within the first 10 days after September 11, according to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories
Approximately three million gallons of water were hosed on site in the fire-fighting efforts, and 1 million gallons fell as rainwater, between 9/11 and 9/21 .
The spraying continued for months afterward (the 10 day period was simply the timeframe in which the DOE was sampling). Enormous amounts of water were hosed on Ground Zero continuously, day and night:
“Firetrucks [sprayed] a nearly constant jet of water on [ground zero]. You couldn’t even begin to imagine how much water was pumped in there,” said Tom Manley of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, the largest fire department union. “It was like you were creating a giant lake.”
Moreover, the fires were sprayed with thousands of gallons of high tech fire-retardants.
And yet, the world trade center fire was “the longest-burning structural fire in history”. The temperatures were so high that there was molten metal at ground zero for months after 9/11.
Why didn’t the enormous quantities of water and fire-retardant sprayed at Ground Zero put out the fires? How could fires and molten metal have burned for months, when fires from normal office and building materials and available sources of oxygen should have been doused by all of the water?
Dr. Steven Jones gives one possibility: “Thermite contains its own supply of oxygen and so the reaction cannot be smothered, even with water”.
The thermite reaction releases dangerous ultra-violet (UV) light requiring that the reaction not be viewed directly, or that special eye protection (for example, a welder’s mask) be worn.
Original source for this article here.
Kevin Ryan: Today's Message to a New York City Councilman
April 8, 2010
Dear Councilman Ulrich,
Last week, on Wednesday 3/31, I spoke with your assistant Liam about my request for you to consider opening a new investigation into what happened to World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11/01. As a follow-up to that discussion, I promised to send more information on the evidence for explosives at the World Trade Center.
As I told Liam, I've co-authored several peer-reviewed scientific articles on the subject. The first one was published in a Civil Engineering journal in early 2008 and was called: "Fourteen Points of Agreement With Official Government Reports on the Destruction of the World Trade Center." This article pointed out the areas in which independent investigators agree with the official reports generated by the federal agencies, FEMA and NIST. The article thereby shows where some of the most important disagreements are found, and how FEMA and NIST left many serious questions unanswered. Here is a link.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM
The second peer-reviewed mainstream article was published in August 2008, by the Springer journal The Environmentalist. This article, entitled Environmental Anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for Energetic Materials," reviews the environmental data produced by EPA and the University of California Davis, and reveals a number of startling and unexplained results. For example, dramatic spikes in volatile organic chemicals in the air emissions suggest that energetic materials were present in the pile at Ground Zero, giving rise to violent but short-lived energetic events for many months. Additionally, several specific metals and inorganic compounds showed the same patterns as did one very unusual semi-volatile organic compound. All this data points to the presence of thermitic materials, which are used as incendiaries or explosives. Although it's not noted in this paper, one should also consider that some of the unusual illnesses seen in the 9/11 first responders are caused by the compounds cited. For example, leukemia is caused by benzene, and sarcoidosis is caused by aluminum oxide.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/
The latest peer-reviewed scientific paper was published by a Chemical Physics journal in April 2009, and is called "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the World Trade Center Catastrophe." There are nine co-authors including the lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. This paper describes analytical work done on four separate samples of WTC dust provided by independent samplers around the Ground Zero area. Extensive characterization was done on small red/gray chips found in all the samples, and the results consistently showed that these red/gray chips are actually active thermitic materials that explode.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If you take the time to read these papers, and the references within them, you'll get some idea of why many people around the world are calling for a new investigation. But I wanted to also address a point made by Liam. He was concerned that I could not tell him exactly who put the explosives in WTC 7, although I told him that it wouldn't be appropriate to speculate. Our nation has already jumped to conclusions regarding 9/11, based on assumptions that were never supported by official reports like those produced by FEMA and NIST. One result of jumping to those conclusions has been that many Americans have died or been wounded in the wars that originated with the events of 9/11.
The important thing to understand is that when scientific evidence demonstrates a certain fact, we should never ignore or deny that fact because we can't immediately explain the history behind it. For example, we have evidence that there is methane in the atmosphere of Titan. This evidence comes from measurements of the light emitted and scattered from that moon. We would not say that it could not be methane because we can't fully explain how the methane got there. Similarly, we have much evidence that there were explosives at the WTC. It would be unwise to ignore that evidence until we can explain how those explosives got there.
Thank you again for your consideration of this important request. If you have any further question on the evidence I've shared, or want to talk about it, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Kevin R. Ryan
Dear Councilman Ulrich,
Last week, on Wednesday 3/31, I spoke with your assistant Liam about my request for you to consider opening a new investigation into what happened to World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11/01. As a follow-up to that discussion, I promised to send more information on the evidence for explosives at the World Trade Center.
As I told Liam, I've co-authored several peer-reviewed scientific articles on the subject. The first one was published in a Civil Engineering journal in early 2008 and was called: "Fourteen Points of Agreement With Official Government Reports on the Destruction of the World Trade Center." This article pointed out the areas in which independent investigators agree with the official reports generated by the federal agencies, FEMA and NIST. The article thereby shows where some of the most important disagreements are found, and how FEMA and NIST left many serious questions unanswered. Here is a link.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM
The second peer-reviewed mainstream article was published in August 2008, by the Springer journal The Environmentalist. This article, entitled Environmental Anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for Energetic Materials," reviews the environmental data produced by EPA and the University of California Davis, and reveals a number of startling and unexplained results. For example, dramatic spikes in volatile organic chemicals in the air emissions suggest that energetic materials were present in the pile at Ground Zero, giving rise to violent but short-lived energetic events for many months. Additionally, several specific metals and inorganic compounds showed the same patterns as did one very unusual semi-volatile organic compound. All this data points to the presence of thermitic materials, which are used as incendiaries or explosives. Although it's not noted in this paper, one should also consider that some of the unusual illnesses seen in the 9/11 first responders are caused by the compounds cited. For example, leukemia is caused by benzene, and sarcoidosis is caused by aluminum oxide.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/
The latest peer-reviewed scientific paper was published by a Chemical Physics journal in April 2009, and is called "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the World Trade Center Catastrophe." There are nine co-authors including the lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. This paper describes analytical work done on four separate samples of WTC dust provided by independent samplers around the Ground Zero area. Extensive characterization was done on small red/gray chips found in all the samples, and the results consistently showed that these red/gray chips are actually active thermitic materials that explode.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If you take the time to read these papers, and the references within them, you'll get some idea of why many people around the world are calling for a new investigation. But I wanted to also address a point made by Liam. He was concerned that I could not tell him exactly who put the explosives in WTC 7, although I told him that it wouldn't be appropriate to speculate. Our nation has already jumped to conclusions regarding 9/11, based on assumptions that were never supported by official reports like those produced by FEMA and NIST. One result of jumping to those conclusions has been that many Americans have died or been wounded in the wars that originated with the events of 9/11.
The important thing to understand is that when scientific evidence demonstrates a certain fact, we should never ignore or deny that fact because we can't immediately explain the history behind it. For example, we have evidence that there is methane in the atmosphere of Titan. This evidence comes from measurements of the light emitted and scattered from that moon. We would not say that it could not be methane because we can't fully explain how the methane got there. Similarly, we have much evidence that there were explosives at the WTC. It would be unwise to ignore that evidence until we can explain how those explosives got there.
Thank you again for your consideration of this important request. If you have any further question on the evidence I've shared, or want to talk about it, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Kevin R. Ryan
Cutter Charges in the North Tower of the WTC
By David Chandler
This project began with an email from Graeme MacQueen to me describing an explosion on the NW corner of WTC1.
I started looking for other such explosions and found a prominent one right at the initiation point on the 98th floor. I further noticed a corner column sticking up after the roofline had fallen past. The top of the surviving column matched the height of the corner ejection moments before. This seemed to be the event that cut the column. The column hovered and swayed for several seconds then precipitously dropped. I wondered if Graeme's explosion was the one that triggered the drop. I found a way to synchronize the videos and then was able to verify that Graeme's "puff" occurred exactly at the moment of drop of the column.
The main significant points I see in this observation are:
1) The building is doing more than just blowing smoke out the windows. The puffs we see are part of the cause of the collapse.
2) We are seeing charges that can cut through the steel corners of the buildings
3) We are seeing a specific 14" column cut by explosives in two places: one to set it loose, and one to cause it to drop.
4) The two explosions occur in a time-delayed sequence, indicative of demolition
(Tony Szamboti and Carolyn Chandler, also made observations that contributed toward this video. All are acknowledged in a credits screen before the closing logo.)
This project began with an email from Graeme MacQueen to me describing an explosion on the NW corner of WTC1.
I started looking for other such explosions and found a prominent one right at the initiation point on the 98th floor. I further noticed a corner column sticking up after the roofline had fallen past. The top of the surviving column matched the height of the corner ejection moments before. This seemed to be the event that cut the column. The column hovered and swayed for several seconds then precipitously dropped. I wondered if Graeme's explosion was the one that triggered the drop. I found a way to synchronize the videos and then was able to verify that Graeme's "puff" occurred exactly at the moment of drop of the column.
The main significant points I see in this observation are:
1) The building is doing more than just blowing smoke out the windows. The puffs we see are part of the cause of the collapse.
2) We are seeing charges that can cut through the steel corners of the buildings
3) We are seeing a specific 14" column cut by explosives in two places: one to set it loose, and one to cause it to drop.
4) The two explosions occur in a time-delayed sequence, indicative of demolition
(Tony Szamboti and Carolyn Chandler, also made observations that contributed toward this video. All are acknowledged in a credits screen before the closing logo.)
MOVIE: Nanothermite
Part 1 of 12
A scientific presentation given by Physics Professor Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., co-editor of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies, and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice gives a presentations in Sacramento, California, on April 30th, 2009.
Part 2 of 12
This is the first lecture by Steven E. Jones after the publication of the peer-reviewed paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal on April 3rd, 2009, which describes that nanothermite, a high-tech, military grade explosive, was used during the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7.
This is the loaded gun of 9/11. Please spread it.
Part 3 of 12
Part 4 of 12
Part 5 of 12
Part 6 of 12
Part 7 of 12
Part 8 of 12
Part 9 of 12
Part 10 of 12
Part 11 of 12
Part 12 of 12
A scientific presentation given by Physics Professor Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., co-editor of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies, and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice gives a presentations in Sacramento, California, on April 30th, 2009.
Part 2 of 12
This is the first lecture by Steven E. Jones after the publication of the peer-reviewed paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal on April 3rd, 2009, which describes that nanothermite, a high-tech, military grade explosive, was used during the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7.
This is the loaded gun of 9/11. Please spread it.
Part 3 of 12
Part 4 of 12
Part 5 of 12
Part 6 of 12
Part 7 of 12
Part 8 of 12
Part 9 of 12
Part 10 of 12
Part 11 of 12
Part 12 of 12
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
