New evidence of controlled demolition not included in "official" report.
Extensive eye witness testimony of the explosives used to destroy the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on September 11, 2001.
This 10 minute video includes presentations by physicist Steven E. Jones on explosive nanothermite found in the World Trade Center dust, and by Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, and Erik Lawyer of Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth.
For more information, please visit AE911Truth.org
Showing posts with label A Case for Explosives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label A Case for Explosives. Show all posts
New Video: 9/11 Firefighters Reveal Huge Explosions Before Towers Collapsed
This important video was received from NIST under the Freedom of Information Act and posted to youTube on October 5, 2010 by IC911STUDIES:
Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11.
Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings.
Explosive Slideshow: "You Can Observe a Lot Just by Watching" Said Yogi Bera
WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1. Rapid onset of "collapse"
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction
3. Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
7. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY
AE911Truth Engineer Does for Free what NIST Couldn’t for Millions
by Dick Scar, 27 July 2010
One of several burning questions surrounding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 was: “Where did the sulfur come from that melted some of the structural steel members from the building so much that they looked more like “Swiss cheese”?
Sulfur reduces the melting point of iron by producing a eutectic mixture. The New York Times called these pieces of melted steel “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.”
FEMA documented the “intergranular melting, rapid oxidation, and sulfidation” of the steel members in Appendix C of their May 2002 Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) Report, yet offered no explanation for this phenomena which required temperatures far in excess of that which office fires or jet fuel could have provided.
Some government officials have attempted to explain the issue away by alleging that the sulfur came from normal building materials like gypsum wallboard.
But gypsum wallboard has been used for a hundred years to protect steel structural members and has never “attacked” it before. Independent scientists have found evidence that the sulfur most likely came from thermate.
Sulfur is added to thermite (an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter) to make thermate.
Scientists and engineers have urged the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to perform experiments to determine the source of the sulfur. But despite spending over $20,000,000 NIST failed to do any experiments or provide a working theory.
He wanted to know if normal building materials, including wallboard, diesel fuel, and aluminum, could release the sulfur needed to attack the steel.
View the dramatic video of this creative no-holds-barred backyard experiment that proves, for free, what NIST could not, or would not, for $20 million.
One of several burning questions surrounding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 was: “Where did the sulfur come from that melted some of the structural steel members from the building so much that they looked more like “Swiss cheese”?
Sulfur reduces the melting point of iron by producing a eutectic mixture. The New York Times called these pieces of melted steel “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.”
FEMA documented the “intergranular melting, rapid oxidation, and sulfidation” of the steel members in Appendix C of their May 2002 Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) Report, yet offered no explanation for this phenomena which required temperatures far in excess of that which office fires or jet fuel could have provided.
Some government officials have attempted to explain the issue away by alleging that the sulfur came from normal building materials like gypsum wallboard.
But gypsum wallboard has been used for a hundred years to protect steel structural members and has never “attacked” it before. Independent scientists have found evidence that the sulfur most likely came from thermate.
Sulfur is added to thermite (an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter) to make thermate.
Scientists and engineers have urged the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to perform experiments to determine the source of the sulfur. But despite spending over $20,000,000 NIST failed to do any experiments or provide a working theory.
Enter Jonathan Cole, P.E., Civil Engineer, who has three keys to success:
A desire to know the truth
A lot of determination
And a big back yard
A desire to know the truth
A lot of determination
And a big back yard
He wanted to know if normal building materials, including wallboard, diesel fuel, and aluminum, could release the sulfur needed to attack the steel.
View the dramatic video of this creative no-holds-barred backyard experiment that proves, for free, what NIST could not, or would not, for $20 million.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
