tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post5109474276193222036..comments2023-04-10T11:13:56.967-03:00Comments on NEW HAMPSHIRE 9/11 TRUTH: The Professional 9/11 Debunker and Paid Internet Troll PlaybookNHTrutherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01499281843665702943noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-57257744019401024642010-09-23T22:48:27.260-03:002010-09-23T22:48:27.260-03:00I wonder how many debunker websites are banning yo...I wonder how many debunker websites are banning you troofers for speaking out?<br /><br /><br /><br />Fricken cowards you troofers are<br /><br />WL45HD8860Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-60777451947923474862010-09-21T10:11:40.373-03:002010-09-21T10:11:40.373-03:00CORRECTED LINK TO:
"There is no evidence tha...CORRECTED LINK TO:<br /><br />"There is no evidence that Muslims committed the crime of 9/11<br />By Elias Davidsson1 10 January 20082"<br /><br />http://www.aldeilis.net/english/attachments/1614_noevidence.pdf<br /><br />It is a pdf document that can be downloaded.NHTrutherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01499281843665702943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-81584984158930772932010-09-20T23:13:53.009-03:002010-09-20T23:13:53.009-03:00The burden of proof is on he who makes the claim. ...The burden of proof is on he who makes the claim. So far, there is not a shred of evidence to support the government's case.<br /><br /><br />Evidence 19 Muslims hijacked 4 planes and crashed them into buildings: From Mark Roberts:<br /><br />"No other Boeing 767s went missing that day, from those airlines or any other.<br /> <br /> Phone calls from passengers and crew in the doomed airliners were recorded.<br /> <br /> AA11 was tracked on radar until shortly before it hit the north tower. UA175 was tracked by radar all the way from its hijacking until it hit the south tower.<br /> <br />Numerous passenger remains from both planes were collected at the WTC scene and positively identified by DNA analysis.<br /> <br />Numerous documents from the passengers and planes were collected at the WTC scene.<br /> <br />You can view all these things on my website, along with numerous witness accounts<br />that describe both airliners hitting the towers, and photos of the airliner debris.<br /> <br />My girlfriend was a witness to both impacts."<br /><br /><br />~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~````<br />Email Response to Mark Robert's Remarks by E. Davidsson:<br /> <br />Re. the phone calls, what is publicly known is that a few of the calls were recorded, not all. <br /> <br />The FBI admitted that it did not formally identify the wreckage of the planes, as is the rule with aircraft crashes. <br /> <br />There is no hard proof that the crashed aircraft were the same that left from the known airports with passengers. <br /> <br />No passenger body was visually identified at the crash sites. <br /> <br />AA11 was NOT tracked on radar continuously from Logan o NYC. Its transponder was turned off, which prevented to follow the aircraft on radar. <br /> <br />Many radar blips were injected to the radar on 9/11 as phony planes as part of the military exercises (simulated hijackings) that took place on the morning of 9/11. <br /> <br />Operators did not know whether the blips belonged to real or to virtual planes and were thus confused.<br /><br /><br />Photographers were denied access to the crash sites. <br /> <br />We do not, therefore, know the origin of the objects that were allegedly found at the crash sites. <br /> <br />At Shanksville, eyewitnesses who were at the alleged crash site before the FBI, did not see any debris, nor bodies or blood.<br /><br /><br />From the above one cannot conclude that NO PLANE was involved in 9/11. One can however conclude that<br /> <br />(a) the US authorities have refused to produce evidence regarding the nature of the crashed objects<br /> <br />(b) there is no proof that the aircraft which left with passengers were the same as the "crashed aircraft", if any<br /> <br />(c) there is no proof that flights AA11, UA175, AA77 and UA93 flew towards the known crash sites<br /> <br />(d) there is no proof that any passenger, crew members or "terrorist" actually boarded any aircraft (no eyewitness actually confirmed the boarding at a specific gate, time and tail number).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-52098100362009981772010-09-20T23:08:23.590-03:002010-09-20T23:08:23.590-03:00Ask Albury Smith about Elias Davidsson, and you...Ask Albury Smith about Elias Davidsson, and you'll be rid of him for good.<br /><br />Elias Davidson 9/19/09:<br /><br /> I wish to make it absolutely clear that there exists no evidence whatsoever that Muslim fanatics hijacked aircraft on 9/11 and flew those aircraft on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. <br /><br />This alone destroys in one sweep the official legend of 9/11 and justifies the suspicion that the WTC buildings were destroyed by the same unidentified parties who staged the aircraft hoax. Anyone can guess who had the capabilities, motives and access to stage these events.<br /><br /> Those who still believe in the legend of the 19 Muslim terrorists should either look for the evidence (that does not exist) or save time by reading my paper which demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt the non-existence of such evidence. Here: <br /><br />http://www.aldeilis.net/english/images/stories/911/noevidence.pdfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-64300085834024863322010-09-20T15:05:12.078-03:002010-09-20T15:05:12.078-03:00NOTE TO READERS:
What is so "dangerous"...NOTE TO READERS: <br /><br />What is so "dangerous" about Albury and his ilk, is that in order to maintain "the official story," bogus debunking websites and other Trolls like him depend on manipulating the lack of information that most people have. Unfortunately, most Americans don't know that "the official story" falls apart when one seriously looks into it.<br /><br />The number of verified architectural and engineering professionals that have called for a new investigation has passed the 1300 mark. This number continually grows. See: http://www.ae911truth.org/<br /><br />The purpose of the NHTruth blog is to give people solid, verifiable info, and let them come to their own conclusions without dogma or vitrol.<br /><br />The false claims of Albury need to be understood and dealt with accordingly. This is his "job" and he won't go away. But we can ignore him and continue our search for the truth of 9/11.NHTrutherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01499281843665702943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-24442280582945933452010-09-20T14:40:53.322-03:002010-09-20T14:40:53.322-03:00Your indignation is comical. As for blocking you -...Your indignation is comical. As for blocking you - I am sorely tempted as you are a total waste of time and attention.....except as a good example of an "Internet Troll."<br /><br />As for "facts" - you don't present facts, you tell lies about the facts we already have. This blog is full of facts - enough to suggest to any thinking person that we need a new and honest investigation into 9/11.<br /><br />If we ever find out who you REALLY are Albury and who is paying you to spread propaganda and to suppress the truth....we'll have another piece of this massive "cover-up" puzzle.<br /><br />You appear to be working extra hard at this full time. Who writes your check for this Albury? Do you get healthcare and other benefits?NHTrutherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01499281843665702943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-15398853712485976912010-09-20T14:02:10.725-03:002010-09-20T14:02:10.725-03:00Blocking my comments is straight out of the 9/11 &...Blocking my comments is straight out of the 9/11 "truth movement" playbook. Do facts really upset you that much?<br />-AlburyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-69322652187559513922010-09-20T11:07:59.821-03:002010-09-20T11:07:59.821-03:00Have you blocked me here yet? That's what peop...Have you blocked me here yet? That's what people of your "ilk" typically do when confronted with facts.<br />-AlburyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-10502910180620421692010-09-20T11:05:46.599-03:002010-09-20T11:05:46.599-03:00I know what I wrote, and my comment stated that th...I know what I wrote, and my comment stated that there was less than 100,000 yards of concrete above grade in both WTC towers combined, regardless of who misquoted me. Gage has stated that 400,000 yards were turned to fine dust in seconds, and that's an obvious impossibility.<br />If you believe that anything I said in the passage you cited was incorrect, please feel free to point it out. All you've done so far is attack me personally.<br /><br />Btw, debunk these:<br /><br />http://www.jod911.com/There_Are_No_Missile_Defenses_at_the_Pentagon.pdf<br /><br />http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/RyanFraud1.jpg<br /><br />Steven Jones has used photos of columns cut with oxyacetylene torches as "evidence" of nanothermite, so you're obviously partial to liars. Have you even read his Bentham farce? It presents no exemplars of anything for comparison, and simply states in its conclusions that the samples "reminded" them of nanothermite. That's research where you come from? <br />Why won't they paint some on a steel column and show us how it works? Show us how it turns concrete to fine dust and keeps steel molten for months too. What utter nonsense...<br />-AlburyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-48610323287669741262010-09-20T10:31:38.355-03:002010-09-20T10:31:38.355-03:00ALBURY: For starters I did a "cut and paste&q...ALBURY: For starters I did a "cut and paste" of your comments and did NOT misquote you.<br /><br />Bothering to chase and debunk your misinformation is a total waste of my time....you have an endless supply of cover-up fantasies that you have spread all over the internet.<br /><br />For people who are genuinely interested in the science of what really happened on 9/11 please read or watch anything by Dr. Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage and/or or Dr. David Ray Griffin. their work is footnoted and all references are given.<br /><br />A little research on your own will give you all the information necessary to debunk Albury and his ilk.NHTrutherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01499281843665702943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-60117975950854682652010-09-20T09:16:49.024-03:002010-09-20T09:16:49.024-03:00I noticed that there was absolutely nothing in the...I noticed that there was absolutely nothing in the article or comments here that addressed anything I wrote, and that you simply resorted to name calling and insults. You also misquoted me on the quantity of concrete above grade in the WTC towers, but facts don't seem to be one of your concerns.<br />-AlburyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-5567718956890561482010-08-18T19:35:47.208-03:002010-08-18T19:35:47.208-03:00This is a great link. I repeat:
http://www.911trut...This is a great link. I repeat:<br />http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050116064744556<br /><br />It is worth reading and will be the subject of another post.<br /><br />Thanks Adam.NHTrutherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01499281843665702943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3262297544918747268.post-72884884724366887442010-08-18T19:02:09.503-03:002010-08-18T19:02:09.503-03:00For a play by play handbook of trolling use this a...For a play by play handbook of trolling use this as your guide: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050116064744556 The 25 rules of disinformation. <br /><br />Number 5 is the most common tactic used by the less sophisticated unpaid trolls and is what you run into the most often since they greatly outnumber the true professional disinfo operatives:<br /><br />5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.<br /><br /><br />All the rules are excellent and will serve as a guide to uncovering trolls and genuine operatives.<br /><br />9/11 was an inside job.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />AdamAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com